The Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) and Public Service Employment Regulations (PSER) govern appointments to positions in the public service. Among their provisions are exceptional clauses that provide an entitlement, for limited periods, for certain persons who meet specific conditions, to be appointed in priority to all others.
Priority entitlements help persons cope with career transitions due to various life and employment events such as Work Force Adjustment (WFA), becoming disabled, returning from extended leave and relocating with one's spouse or common-law partner. The entitlements also help the Employer retain skilled employees and meet its obligations in WFA.
Persons entitled to a priority for appointment pursuant to the PSEA or the PSER shall be appointed, in priority to all others, to positions for which they meet the essential qualifications.
By virtue of their delegated staffing authority, deputy heads share the goals and values of the Public Service Commission (PSC) in respecting priority entitlements and ensuring appropriate consideration of the core and guiding values of the PSEA throughout all aspects of their staffing activities, including the fair and transparent consideration of priority persons.
In addition, deputy heads must respect the other policies within the Appointment Framework.
Deputy heads must:
As indicated in the Guide to Implementing the Choice of an Appointment Process Policy, the PSC maintains the Priority Information Management System (PIMS) and deputy heads must search the priority persons' inventory through an automated on-line process that provides priority referrals. A priority clearance number is required before proceeding with an appointment process.
The start dates and duration of the various entitlements are set by the PSEA and PSER and cannot be altered by organizations or by the PSC.
There are a number of separate agencies that are subject to the PSEA. Employees of these agencies are entitled to priority entitlements. In the case of surplus and lay-off priority entitlements, refer to Part II, chapter 3, section 3.8 of this Guide for more details.
The separate agencies subject to the PSEA are:
The following lists and briefly describes the priority provisions of the PSEA and the PSER. Additional details about each priority type are provided in Part II of this Guide.
The priority entitlements within the PSEA are referred to as “statutory priorities”. Persons with a statutory priority are appointed ahead of all others, in the following order:
The priority entitlements within the PSER are referred to as “regulatory priorities”. Persons with a regulatory priority are appointed after persons with a statutory priority, but in no relative order.
The entitlement to a priority is not "granted" at the discretion of either the PSC or other organizations in the public service. Persons who meet the conditions specified in the PSEA or the PSER automatically acquire a personal right that is guaranteed by law. Therefore, the entitlement is not dependent on the person being referred to an organization by the PSC.
Parliament has put in place priority entitlements to help people cope with changes to their lives and careers, such as workforce adjustment, becoming disabled, relocating with a spouse or common-law partner, being medically released from the CF or RCMP or the death of a spouse or common-law partner who was employed in the public service, the CF or the RCMP.
Appointing persons with priority entitlements assists the public service in retaining competent employees and provides hiring managers with a database of potentially qualified persons who can be appointed quickly and efficiently.
It is not just the law; it is a corporate responsibility that crosses all federal organizations subject to the PSEA and all managerial and Executive (EX) levels within those organizations.
In general, priority entitlements apply to any and all appointment processes. This means that:
Further to changes in the Employer's policy on deployment, employees with a salary that is equivalent to that of an EX position are now eligible for referral by the PSC to EX positions.
The following important changes are related to amendments to the PSER:
Each priority type is for a limited period and is subject to certain conditions, as specified in the PSEA and PSER. These conditions are listed for each priority type in their respective chapters in Part II of this Guide.
The start dates and durations of the various entitlements are set by the PSEA and PSER and cannot be altered by organizations or by the PSC.
Where more than one priority person is available and qualified for appointment, persons with a statutory priority are appointed ahead of all others, in the order shown in section 1.5 of this Guide. Persons with a regulatory priority are appointed after persons with a statutory priority, but in no relative order.
When staffing positions pursuant to organizationally approved employment equity (EE) programs, only the priority persons who are also members of the target or designated EE group(s) used for the process must be considered in priority to all other persons. Priority persons registered in the priority administration system have been coded as to their membership in EE groups if they have self-identified as such. Positions that are not staffed in accordance with an organizationally-approved EE program are subject to priority consideration of all priority persons.
Under Section 43 of the PSEA, if the Commission considers that the appointment of a person who has a right to be appointed in priority to other persons will result in another person having a priority right, the Commission may decide not to apply the priority entitlements in that case. For example, a manager may propose conducting an internal staffing process restricted to employees in a work unit that is affected by work force adjustment. The appointment of a priority person from outside the unit would result in the need to declare another employee surplus. In such situations, the PSC may require the organization to provide a copy of its WFA Plan to support the request. If the organization intends not to apply priority entitlements, it must clearly explain the situation to the PSC in detail when submitting its request for priority clearance.
NOTE: Surplus and lay-offs
In addition to priority rights under the PSEA and PSER, surplus and laid-off employees also have entitlements under the WFA Appendices (WFAAs) and related collective agreements. These entitlements include retraining in cases where they do not qualify for immediate appointment and salary protection if appointed to a lower level. For further information, consult the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat's (TBS) Web site. These agreements are the responsibility of the Employer. All questions concerning their application and interpretation should be directed to TBS.
The PSC is responsible for administering and overseeing the provisions of the PSEA with respect to priority entitlements and monitoring staffing practices in relation to the legislative framework for priorities and the PSC's appointment values.
More specifically, the PSC:
By virtue of their delegated staffing authority, organizations share the goals and values of the PSC in respecting priority entitlements by ensuring appropriate consideration of the core and guiding values of the PSEA when considering priority persons, including ensuring access and the fair and transparent consideration of priority persons. Organizations are accountable to the PSC for their own administration of the entitlements.
Organizations must:
By virtue of their priority entitlement, priority persons must be considered for appointment before all others. While priority entitlements are meant to provide continuity of employment for the priority person, they should not be interpreted as a right to be appointed to the same type of position held previously, nor should such entitlements be interpreted as an opportunity for promotion.
Priority persons must:
Priority persons are encouraged to seek information on their assessments from the hiring manager. This assessment feedback can be helpful in understanding where potential gaps exist, assisting the priority person in preparing for subsequent assessments.
Priority persons who do not have access to job opportunities advertised on Publiservice may use the reader service, which is available by telephone at 1-800-461-6263 outside the National Capital Region (NCR), or (613) 941-8979 within the NCR, between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. EST. The number for persons using a TTY/TDD is 1-800-465-7735. Copies of the notices are available by fax upon request. Persons without Internet access may also review jobs open to the public through INFOTEL at 1-800-645-5605. The INFOTEL number for persons using a TTY/TDD is 1-800-532-9397.
All priority persons should be registered in PIMS, including those who will be appointed immediately or very soon after registration. Prior to registration, the priority person is required to sign a Privacy Consent Form in order for their organizations to register them in PIMS. Please refer to the note on Priority persons must, in the previous page.
The start dates and duration of the various entitlements are set by the PSEA and/or PSER and cannot be altered. The PSC will only begin marketing the priority person once they are registered in PIMS. Late registration will reduce the effective period of entitlement and may result in lost opportunities for the priority person. Please refer to the document entitled Validity Period of Priority Entitlements.
There are exceptions to registration – only the PSC registers persons entitled to the reinstatement priority, as well as the surviving spouse or common-law partner priority in instances where the death of the person employed in the public service occurred on or before May 12, 2010. Where death occurs after May 12, 2010, the organization registers persons entitled to this priority.
Some priority entitlements can run concurrently. In those cases, PIMS captures the one that is dominant (has the longest period and/or the most benefit). The other entitlement is noted and activated, if it is still relevant, after the other priority expires. For example, if the employee is entitled to a leave of absence priority as well as the priority for an employee who becomes disabled, then the leave of absence priority is captured and displayed, as this is a higher level of priority.
Determining whether a person has refused an offer of appointment without good and sufficient reason applies to the following priority types:
The start dates and durations of the various entitlements are set by the PSEA and PSER and cannot be altered by organizations or by the PSC. The PSC cannot “extend” priority periods to compensate for time missed due to late registrations; therefore, it is very important that priority persons be registered by the organization as soon as their entitlement begins.
Organizations initiate the clearance process by submitting a Request for Priority Clearance through PIMS.
Priority entitlements apply to nearly all staffing actions that result in appointments.
Staffing actions that require priority clearance:
Use of PSEA s. 43 - If the appointment of a person with a priority entitlement will result in another person having a priority right, the organization may appoint indeterminate employees from an internal appointment process without considering persons with priority entitlements. However, for monitoring purposes, priority clearance must be obtained through PIMS. Clearance will be granted automatically, but the PSC requires organizations to wait two working days after receiving an auto-clearance before making an appointment (refer to section 1.6 - Non-application of entitlements and section 1.9.3 - Referrals or auto-clearance by the PSC).
Staffing actions that do not require priority clearance:
Hiring organizations:
PIMS automatically searches the priority inventory, comparing priority persons with the job specifications in the clearance request, based on:
If no priority persons are identified through this search, PIMS issues an automatic clearance to the organization.
The PSC requires organizations to wait two working days after receiving an auto-clearance before making an appointment. This is to give priority administration officers time to review the request to ensure that it was coded correctly. Any corrections made may result in the referral of priority persons.
If PIMS finds potential matches, one of two things takes place:
2012-01-11: A modification was made to section 1.9.4 of the French version of this guide.
The PSC refers priority persons for positions that are equivalent to, or one level lower than, the level of their substantive position. Priority persons are referred to lower-level positions at their request, in the interest of improving their chances of finding a position.
The PSC will not normally refer persons to higher-level positions. Priority persons seeking appointment to higher-level positions, including EX positions, are advised to conduct their own job searches. Priority persons who wish to be considered for such positions must inform the hiring organization of their interest, and that they have priority status. The hiring organization must respect the priority entitlement, keeping in mind that it applies to positions at any level for which the priority person meets the essential qualifications. Only in the case of a priority person requesting consideration for a higher-level position can a hiring organization opt to assess the priority person along with other candidates. These assessments must be conducted in a timely manner to ensure priority persons' entitlements are not jeopardized.
It is important to ensure that persons entitled to a priority are treated fairly and that the process and outcome are transparent. Priority persons must be given a reasonable opportunity to prepare for whatever interviews, exams or other assessment methods will be used, just as would be the case for candidates in any appointment process.
Hiring organizations must:
Priority persons referred by the PSC must normally be assessed PRIOR to other candidates. This is to ensure that the legislative requirement for priority persons to be appointed ahead of all others is maintained; ensuring fairness in their assessment by avoiding comparison with candidates in an appointment process while aiding in the efficiency of the appointment process. The PSC expects assessments of priority people to be conducted within 60 days of a referral, and will be monitoring how long assessments take. Delays in assessments may result in the PSC cancelling a request and requiring a new request to be submitted.
Organizations must report the assessment results to the PSC, using the PIMS Priority Referral Feedback Form.
The PSC then determines whether priority clearance should be issued either to appoint a priority person or to proceed with another staffing action. Additional information will be sought and corrective action will be required to correct errors or omissions in the process before a clearance number is issued, as needed.
The Priority Referral Feedback Form also keeps the priority inventory up-to-date, promotes accurate referrals in subsequent cases and helps the PSC act as an intermediary in cases where the priority person is concerned about the assessment.
The Feedback Form must:
For indeterminate processes, there must be evidence that the priority person was contacted and responded and was assessed if interested in being considered for the position. For specified term processes, the organization may screen the priority person, based on information available in PIMS.
For monitoring and oversight purposes, organizations must retain the priority clearance number on their staffing files, along with other written information about the assessment process and the results for each priority person considered.
As discussed in the section on referrals or auto-clearance by the Public Service Commission, the PSC also monitors the auto-clearances that are provided by PIMS when no priority persons are identified for referral, to ensure that the search criteria are accurate in terms of the positions being staffed. If necessary, corrective action will be applied to any appointment resulting from a flawed priority search.
Managers should be careful not to mistake a "clearance" issued through their own organization's priority system for a PSC priority clearance.
Priority clearance numbers are issued when there are no priority persons to refer or when no priority persons who have been referred are found to meet the essential qualifications for appointment. If referrals have been made, the priority clearance number is issued only after the PSC has approved the hiring organization's Priority Referral Feedback Form.
Only one priority clearance number is issued for a request, regardless of the number of positions to be staffed. Clearance is valid for the number of positions mentioned in the initial clearance request. The PSC will not normally refer additional priority persons after a clearance number has been issued. However, the PSC reserves the right to establish a time limit for some or all priority clearances and/or to refer additional priority persons after a clearance has been issued, until an appointment is made to the position(s) in question. Appointments to positions that have received priority clearance should be made within a reasonable period of time from the date of the priority clearance number being issued. The PSC monitors appointment dates for multiple-position clearance requests and may refer additional priorities if it considers that an unreasonable length of time has elapsed between the granting of the clearance number and the appointments to the positions indicated in the initial request. This helps to ensure that all priority persons receive fair consideration. A new request is required for any appointments to additional positions that were not part of the initial request.
A new priority clearance number is required if:
Priority persons may directly contact managers who are planning to staff or are in the process of running an appointment process, after having received clearance to do so. In such cases, the first duty of the organization is to confirm the person's entitlement. This confirmation can be obtained through PIMS. Priority persons who self-refer must be treated as if they had been referred by the PSC, including their appointment ahead of all others, if found qualified.
If a priority person self-refers to a hiring organization, either before or after a priority clearance has been given, the organization is required to respect that person's priority entitlement, regardless of the level of the position. A self-referral carries the same weight as a referral by the PSC, but in the case of self-referral to a higher level position, the organization is permitted to assess the priority person along with the other candidates.
The PSC normally requires that priority persons referred to organizations as a result of a clearance request be assessed prior to the assessment of any other persons. However, because self-referrals often occur after an organization has started its staffing process, the PSC will allow self-referred priority persons seeking positions at levels higher than their substantive level to be assessed along with the rest of the candidates involved in the process, provided the organization does not jeopardize the priority person's entitlement's duration in so doing. For self-referrals to equivalent or lower-level positions, the priority person must be assessed before the other candidates to ensure fairness in their assessment and to avoid having them compared to the rest of the candidates.
Travel and relocation costs are the responsibility of the Employer. All questions concerning their application and interpretation should be directed to TBS.
The responsibility for travel and relocation costs incurred while considering or appointing priority persons varies according to the situation. The following outlines responsibility for such costs when priority persons meet the eligibility requirements of the applicable TBS policies. Priority persons are encouraged to speak to their organization's HR staff for advice on eligibility for travel or relocation expenses.
NOTE: For more information, review the applicable WFAAs and the directives on travel and relocation found on the TBS Web site.
Where a priority person is being appointed without having been referred by the PSC, for example where a priority person has self-referred, the hiring organization will add that person's name to an existing Priority Referral Feedback Form that has not yet been submitted. If there is no existing form, (e.g., if an auto-clearance had been provided or if the organization proposes to appoint one of its own priority persons), then the organization will complete a new request for priority clearance, using "to appoint a priority person" (Code I. (12) in PIMS) as the proposed appointment process.
To respect the priority entitlements under the PSEA and the PSER, as well as the order of priority appointments, PIMS will search for other priority persons on all clearance requests, including those using appointment process Code I. (12). This means that other priority persons may be identified by PIMS and the organization may receive additional referrals of priority persons.
The hiring organization is required to provide a copy of the letter of offer, with all signatures, to the PSC within 14 calendar days of the date of appointment. This will allow the PSC to change the priority entitlement or remove the priority person from the system, as appropriate.
The preamble of the PSEA states that the public service should be characterized by fair, transparent employment practices, respect for employees, effective dialogue and recourse aimed at resolving appointment issues. Priority persons should seek information concerning their assessment from the relevant manager in the hiring organization. In keeping with the spirit of the preamble, the PSC encourages managers to discuss their decisions fully with priority persons.
If the discussions with the hiring organization do not resolve an issue, concerned priority persons may turn to the PSC for assistance on matters within the PSC's jurisdiction.
The PSC's Priority Administration Unit will intervene in cases where the priority consideration process is ongoing or an appointment has not yet been made. If necessary, the PSC can refuse or revoke a priority clearance, thereby preventing the organization from making an appointment.
The PSC's Investigations Branch will investigate complaints, as appropriate.
The WFAD and the WFAAs are the responsibility of TBS. For details and up-to-date text and interpretations, please consult the Work Force Adjustment section of the TBS Web site. These agreements are the responsibility of the Employer and all questions concerning their application and interpretation should be directed to TBS.
Organizations are responsible for monitoring and managing their own administration of priority entitlements.
Priority persons referred by the PSC must normally be assessed PRIOR to other candidates. This is to ensure fairness in their assessment and to avoid having them compared to the rest of the candidates. The PSC expects assessments of priority people to be conducted within 60 days of a referral and will be monitoring how long assessments take. Delays in assessments may result in the PSC cancelling a request and requiring a new one to be submitted.
For monitoring and oversight purposes, organizations must retain the priority clearance number on their staffing files, along with other written information about the assessment process and the results for each priority person considered. Organizations should be careful not to mistake a “clearance” issued through their own organization’s priority system for a PSC priority clearance.
As discussed in the section on referrals or auto-clearance by the Public Service Commission the PSC also monitors the auto-clearances that are provided by PIMS when no priority persons are identified for referral to ensure that the search criteria are accurate in terms of the positions being staffed. If necessary, corrective action will be applied to any appointment resulting from a flawed priority search.
The PSC reserves the right to establish a time limit for some or all priority clearances and/or to refer additional priority persons after a clearance has been issued, until an appointment is made to the position(s) in question. Any such time limit may vary in accordance with regional priority administration activity levels, occupational group staffing volumes, WFA activities by organization or region or any other aspect, as determined by the PSC.
Appointments to positions that have received priority clearance should be made within a reasonable period of time from the date of the priority clearance number being issued. The PSC monitors appointment dates for multiple-position clearance requests and may refer additional priorities if it considers that an unreasonable length of time has elapsed between the granting of the clearance number and the appointments to the positions indicated in the initial request. This helps to ensure that all priority persons receive fair consideration.
In addition to information collected within each organization, information is available from the following sources: