Appointment Policy Considerations
Assessment
In making a decision on assessment, deputy heads may want to consider
that:
- There must be a clear link between qualifications and assessment
tools and methods.
- All essential qualifications for a position must
be assessed, but the merit criteria can be applied in any order.
- A
person can be eliminated from further consideration as soon as it is
shown that he or she does not possess an essential or asset qualification,
or does not meet the operational requirements or organizational needs
identified for the position.
- The following are commonly recognized
assessment methods: interview, samples of previous work, simulation/situational
exercise, written
tests, assessment centre, review of past accomplishments and experience.
- The
use of more than one assessment method or source of information; for
example, an interview and a simulation, usually improves the quality
of the assessment.
- Assessment tools must be administered fairly, which
does not necessarily mean using the same assessment tools for all persons
being assessed.
In assessing persons with disabilities, it may be necessary to modify
the assessment procedures to allow for a fair assessment of their qualifications.
- It is not necessary for persons with disabilities to self-identify
in order to request accommodation during the appointment process.
- Selecting
and training designated group members and people from diverse backgrounds
as selection board members supports bias-free appointment
decisions.
- Different persons can be responsible for the assessment
in an appointment process as long as the assessments are conducted
in the same manner
and the information collected by those persons can be integrated to determine
the merit of all the persons being assessed in a fair manner.
- Tools
are available to assist in the assessment of candidates: