(for employees, managers and organizational designated individuals)
This document is designed to provide guidance in the context of political activities other than those related to candidacy. For more information on how to obtain the approval of the Public Service Commission (PSC) to seek nomination or to be a candidate, please consult the Regulations on Candidacy and the Procedure for requesting Permission and Leave.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides all Canadians with "freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression" and any restriction should be "only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society".
Your important right to engage in any political activity at the federal, provincial, territorial or municipal level is embodied in the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA). The Act also cites the need to maintain the political impartiality of the federal public service. The PSEA states that you may engage in any political activity as long as it does not impair or is not perceived by others as impairing your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner.
Your political rights as a federal public service employee must, therefore, be examined in light of the need to maintain a politically impartial public service. The principle of political impartiality of the public service is a fundamental value that ensures that Canadians benefit from non-partisan delivery of services.
The PSEA defines "political activity" as:
A "political party" is an organization that presents candidates with the intent of their being elected in a federal, provincial, territorial or municipal election.
While you are free to engage in political activities, these political activities must be examined on a case-by-case basis to assess whether or not the activity would impair or be perceived by others as impairing your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner in light of your specific circumstances.
It is important to know that anyone may put forward an allegation of improper political activity against federal public servants, and the PSC may investigate these allegations. A founded allegation may lead to corrective measures, which could include dismissal.
It should be noted that activities that do not fit the above definition are subject to the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service (Code) or, in cases where Treasury Board is not the employer, to the organization's applicable values and ethics code for an organization, and could, therefore, be problematic for reasons other than those related to the PSEA. For example, speaking out in the media against the federal government or against a federal policy, would not be a political activity as defined in the PSEA. It may, however, in certain circumstances, be problematic under the Code, as it may give rise to a real, apparent or potential conflict of interest or because of the duty of loyalty you owe to your employer.
The list below sets out examples of political activities within the meaning of the PSEA. Of course, voting in an election is a political activity that is permissible in all instances.
There is a tool available to you which is intended to help you, the employee, make reasonable decisions about your involvement in political activities. It can help you assess whether a given political activity would impair, or could be perceived by others as impairing, your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner. This assessment, which is done on a case-by-case basis in light of your specific circumstances, examines factors such as the nature of the activity you wish to engage in, the nature of your duties as well as the level and visibility of your position.
The tool consists of general information and examples of political activities, followed by a brief series of questions relevant to your situation. At the end of the questionnaire you will be able to view, print and save your answers and get a sense of whether or not the activity in question could be problematic.
This tool should not, however, be seen as the only mechanism for making this decision. You are encouraged to discuss your specific circumstances with your head of human resources or the departmental representative identified in your organization. You may also wish to consult a colleague or another individual who is familiar with your duties to validate the objectivity of your answers once you have completed the questionnaire.
When considering whether engaging in a specific activity might be problematic, you should consider the factors below in light of the given political activity and your own specific circumstances. It is important to note that the impact of a single factor may be sufficient to conclude that an activity is unacceptable.
The nature of your duties is important because the greater your influence or contact with others -- i.e., subordinates, the public, politicians or political staff -- the more likely it is that the activity could impair, or be perceived by others as impairing, your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner.
You should consider:
The level of your position is important because the higher you are in the hierarchy the more likely it is that your political activities will be perceived as impairing your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner.
The visibility of your position is also important because it may be easier for others to associate you with the position you occupy. You should keep in mind that in regions or isolated communities you may be more visible, regardless of the level you occupy, in light of the fact that employees in these areas may be more easily associated with their positions.
The activity may not be problematic if:
It may, however, be problematic if:
The activity may not be problematic for:
The activity may, however, be problematic if:
Why this could be problematic: based on "the nature of the activity, i.e. its visibility" or "the nature of your duties or the visibility of your position," the risk of being perceived as engaging in a political activity that could impair your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner is increased.
This activity is problematic.
Why this is problematic: these political activities impair, and will be perceived by others as impairing, your ability to perform your duties in a politically impartial manner.
For further information you may wish to consult Frequently Asked Questions.
This legislation applies to all employees of organizations of the federal public service to which the PSEA applies.
It also applies to employees of additional agencies to whom the political activities provisions of the PSEA apply, i.e.:
This includes part-time employees.
While this part of the legislation does not apply to casual employees, they remain subject to the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service or, in cases where Treasury Board is not the employer, to the organization's applicable values and ethics code for an organization, and should assess their political activities in accordance with the requirements outlined therein.
Should you not fall within these categories, you are encouraged to consult with your head of human resources to determine the applicable rules or the expected behaviour within your organization.
Deputy heads cannot engage in any political activity other than voting.
While the PSC is responsible for safeguarding the political impartiality of the public service and for providing guidance and advice to public servants, departments and agencies also have an important role to play. For example, deputy heads or their designates are responsible for:
In addition, deputy heads or their designates will continue to have a role to play in the context of the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Service or, in cases where Treasury Board is not the employer, to the organization's applicable values and ethics code for an organization, as it applies to activities that do not fall within the definition of "political activity" under the PSEA.
Employees are responsible for examining their specific circumstances in order to determine whether or not they can engage in a given political activity, and for seeking advice from their manager, head of human resources or their organization's designated representative when in doubt.